Today's
retirement-age attorneys are healthier and more energized than any previous generation.
Many are eager to work and stay relevant
beyond the traditional age of retirement.They also want to make additional money to fund their retirement whether
they envision relaxing, traveling or exploring a second career.
To
support attorneys taking a proactive interest in designing their futures, we
held a workshop, Targeting Your Exit Strategy, geared for small
firm and solo practitioners. On the first morning, a 59 year old
estate-planning attorney raised his hand and summed up the sentiments of the
group: "I worked so hard trying to get into the practice of law, and
then I worked so hard trying to build my practice-I never anticipated I'd have
to work on how to get out."
Retirement
is simple, right? You just have to stop working.
Perhaps
that was true twenty years ago, but contemporary notions of retirement are
rapidly changing.1Even the
word "retirement" is being retired in favor of words like transition or evolution.
In the workshop, the attorneys spoke of their careers as "morphing" into
something different, or "going to the next stage." Almost no one wanted to
close the doors of the firm and just walk away. They wanted new opportunities
and innovative arrangements that allowed them to ratchet down their involvement
while remaining in the game.
Define
New Retirement Needs
This
still vital generation doesn't want to reenact grim historical stereotypes:the hardworking, older attorney who "dies at his
desk," the aging attorney who is mentally retired but physically present, and,
in larger firms, the attorney who is forced out due to archaic retirement
rules.
Workshop
attendees wanted fresh examples of how to map futures. For example:
Solo
practitioners speculated about whether or not they could sell their
practices. Having spent their lives building firms, they were justifiably
interested in a robust return on their investment.
Partners in small
firms wanted to transition in the next couple of years, but were paralyzed
because their firms couldn't return their original capital investment or
pay them a retirement benefit.
Founding
partners-the marquee names on their letterhead-wanted to travel, but
feared their firms would nose-dive without their involvement or rainmaking
abilities. Naturally, if their firms did poorly after they left, their
retirement benefits would be at risk.
Other
practitioners were reluctant to leave their firms because no other
attorneys had sufficient expertise to succeed them.
To
begin the process, we first determined that all of the participants were
healthy.We then asked them to assess
their financial situation:could they
afford 25 to 30 years of retirement? According
to financial advisors, people need at least three-quarters of their
pre-retirement income to support themselves after the transition-if they plan
to downsize somewhat. Obviously, the more people downsize their lifestyle, the
less expensive it is.
While
a great many attorneys happily choose to work through all or part of
their later years, some have to work.Second only to the state of your health, whether or not you intend to
continue working is the most important piece of the retirement puzzle. Resolve
this first so you can then create a realistic vision for your future.
Envision
Your Future
We
then gave the participants a list of various transition scenarios and asked
with which one they most identified. Here is a short version of the list. See
which scenarios resonate with you.
1.Part-time,
Of Counsel Position with a Substantive Focus
(Multi-partner firms)
This
"of counsel" position is the ideal solution for a partner in a multi-partner
firm who loves the practice of law and whose firm requires his ongoing technical
expertise. Post-transition, the semi-retired attorney is able to cherry-pick
his cases and work 2 or 3 days a week, gradually winding down through the first
5 or 10 years of retirement. This allows him to stay relevant longer, keeps his
mind engaged, and further funds his retirement.
As
part of this plan, the attorney may negotiate an initial break in service to
enjoy a sabbatical or long-awaited vacation.
Compensation
is based on production-typically 33% to 50% of collected fees, though the
attorney may request to be paid a straight hourly rate.
The
semi-retiredattorney may maintain an office
at the firm, share an office or work in the firm's conference room, or have a
home or remote office. He may require some staff support depending on the level
of production. Typically, the attorney turns over his managerial or
administrative responsibilities and loses his vote as a member of the
partnership.
2.Part-time,
Of Counsel Position with a Client Development Focus
(Multi-partner firms)
As
in the previous scenario, the attorney in this position works part-time, may
take an initial break in service, and stages her departure on a scheduled
basis. Client development, not production, is the focus of her work.
This
is an ideal position for the firm's marketing partner or senior rainmaker who
wants to bring in new clients, maintain established referral relationships,
train younger partners and associates on client development and eventually, totransfer all referral relationships.
Due
to the value of her network, compensation is based mainly on origination-typically
10% to 33% of collected fees with allowances made for new work from existing
sources.
This
attorney will leave her name on the letterhead for a negotiated period of time,
maintain an office at the firm, share an office or meet clients in the firm's
conference room. She will require minimal or no staff support. Typically, the
attorney turns over her managerial or administrative responsibilities and loses
her vote as a member of the partnership, but should be consulted when marketing
strategies are discussed.
3.Of Counsel
Position-"In Name Only"
(Multi-partner firms)
The
founding partner-in this case, someone whose name is an important part of the
firm's brand-ceases production and virtually all participation in the firm
except for special occasions, but continues to lend his name to the firm.
His
actual presence at the firm is negotiable; compensation is based solely on the
value associated with the partner's name and is usually paid as a fixed monthly
fee for a specified length of time, often 5 to 10 years. To determine the fee,
the firm must track the number of new work and new client inquiries
attributable to the partner for 1 to 2 years prior to the partner's
transition. Based on this history, a monthly value is assigned.
The
attorney, who may maintain a token office at the firm, share an office or
occasionally meet clients in the firm's conference room, depending on the
degree of presence agreed upon, requires minimal or no staff support.
4.The Succession Approach
(Solo practitioners and multi-partner firms)
Over
a five to seven year period, the firm founder or partner in charge of a
practice group transitions to an of counsel position, while an associate
attorney is trained, and/or becomes partner and assumes leadership of the firm
or practice group. The founder or practice group leader trains the new attorney.
Existing
staff may remain in place, or be replaced with new staff depending on what the
founder or partner and the new attorney negotiate. To fund their capital
investment, an upcoming associate may contribute a lump sum or may contribute
through payroll deduction over time (usually five to seven years).2
5.Outright Sale Approach
(Solo practitioners and multi-partner firms)
In
this case, the attorney/owner sells her practice to an attorney/buyer who did
not come up through the ranks as an associate. The transition period may take
six months to two years unless an urgent situation (failing health, for
example) necessitates the sale.
The
price of the firm is based primarily on the type of law practiced, the value of
the firm's book of business, the potential for repeat business, the
transferability of referral relationships, the firm's proprietary systems and
sometimes the reputation or "goodwill" attributable to the firm.While
other factors come in to play, these are the most important. 3
During
the transition, the selling attorney may maintain an office at the firm, share
an office, or meet clients in the firm conference room. Alternately, the seller
may have a home or remote office.
The
seller will need support staff only during the transition, not after it's
completed.Often, the selling attorney
becomes of counsel to the old firm to further fund its retirement, provide
additional expertise or to help maintain referral relationships.
6.Transfer Book of Business to another Firm and Become Of Counsel
(Solo practitioners or a partner in multi-partner
firm)
The
attorney transfers her book of business out entirely (with the signed
permission of the clients obtained in advance and in accordance with all local
ethics rules).
If
the attorney is a solo practitioner, she has usually closed up shop entirely.
Partners in multi-partner firms leave in a manner consistent with whatever
contractual agreements were in place.
The
attorney becomes of-counsel to the new firm and is paid either on a percentage
or an hourly wage to support the resolution of the cases she brought.
7.2nd
Career Approach: Teach, Write a Book, Manage Investments
(Suitable for all attorneys)
For
attorneys who want to leave their firms and yet remain active and involved, who
are financially independent and can make money outside of the law, who do not
seek post-transition employment, or who cannot sell their firms, this is a
recommended scenario.They can spend
time doing pro bono work as an emeritus attorney, teach, write, pursue a second
career, or manage real estate (for more information, see the ABA's website.
Spend
some time with these scenarios deciding which one will be most helpful to
you.If you deny or avoid the subject, you
won't form an exit strategy that engages you, excites you or pulls you forward.
You need a clear vision to approach this critical stage of your life. Harry Emerson Fosdick said it best: "Don't simply retire from something; have
something to retire to."
FOOTNOTES
1 Phyllis Korkki,
"When Retirement Collides With Reality," The New York Times, January 20, 2008.
2
James
D. Cotterman, Editor, Compensation Plans for Law Firms, 4th
Edition Chicago, Illinois, American Bar Association, 2004.
3 Edward Poll, Selling
Your Law Practice: The Profitable Exit Strategy, Law Biz Management
Company, 2005.